Hygiene Central - Part of The London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineWater Graphic
Practitioners - Researchers - Students - Partners - Experts

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Home
Search
Sitemap
Contact
Login

News
People
Projects
Research Areas
Publications
Resources
Links

Archive

You are at Sanitation Deep Link

Product Innovation

Summary

In depth...

The percieved need to be always integrated with water supply


Rethinking the latrine design process

The customer must sit at the top of the design process therefore products must be designed to meet their needs. In some households the constraint may not be financial but rather the lack of a design or technology that can meet their aspirations and situation. In most cases affordability is an issue and there is likely to be a niche in the market for good quality but cheaper latrine designs.

Latrines are usually designed by engineers working to a technical specification and not to a target cost or to meet the needs of the consumer. Further limitations may be imposed by over zealous building standards and health regulations, e.g. Ghana and the KVIP. The net result is an over designed technically correct latrine which few can afford. This approach needs to be changed to that of risk limitation, extreme affordability and an appreciation that a latrine perceived to be sub–standard by health officials is still significantly better than no latrine at all. The biggest hurdle in many areas is actually encouraging families to use a latrine and stop open defecation. Defecation in a pit rather than in the open breaks the faecal-oral route. This health benefit should be accepted by programme implementers, who should concentrate on promoting latrine up-grading to maximise the benefits.

If building standards can be relaxed, a whole range of innovative solutions become possible which are capable of making the acquisition of a latrine much cheaper. International Development Enterprises (IDE) describe the three building blocks of making cheaper designs as:

• Miniaturisation – are 3m deep pits necessary? Will a 1m deep pit coupled with a reliable emptying service work just as well?
• Affordability to the rural poor price is always important. Are expensive concrete slabs absolutely necessary? Are there cheaper alternatives?
• Expandable – This enables households to build latrines in small affordable sections. House building processes in developing countries are incremental i.e. the owner first saves to buy the land, then saves to pay for the cement for the foundations, then for the bricks etc. Its not completed all at once as in the Northern countries. House building is matched with the family income flows and avoids the need for banking services.

Practical steps to making a latrine design effective and cheap

1. Analyse what the technology does
2. Set specific cost targets
3. Identify key contributors to cost. Analyse each component and rank them
4. Design around each of the key contributors to cost before finding acceptable trade offs. These include
• Capital for labour – rural poor usually have lots of time, but no cash
• Quality vs. Affordability – if its really cheap then a design life of a few years could be acceptable.
5. Make changes based on field test experience
6. Always go through fields testing if you move to a new place

When the shackles of regulation and convention are removed, local masons and artisans are often the best source of innovation and product development. They are aware of their customers’ needs, and the availability of materials, and if successful, will have pride and a stake in the use and further development of the innovation.


Hygiene Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Tel:+ 44 207 927 2214 Fax:+ 44 207 636 7843

 
pauledwards.biz